Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi; Fahimeh Mirchooli; Zeinab Hazbavi; Abdulvahed Khaledi Darvishan; Mohsen Khorsand
Abstract
Measuring soil erosion and sediment yield using different methods is necessary to achieve integrated and reliable information from amount of soil loss. In this regards, the application of new and up-to-date innovative methods is required and important to facilitate the measurements, which leads to increase ...
Read More
Measuring soil erosion and sediment yield using different methods is necessary to achieve integrated and reliable information from amount of soil loss. In this regards, the application of new and up-to-date innovative methods is required and important to facilitate the measurements, which leads to increase the accuracy. However, there is no enough information for the efficiency assessment of innovative techniques. An optic scanner method therefore was used in the present study to measure soil particles detached/transported by splash/runoff. Then, the obtained results were compared with two traditional methods. Including rillmeter and paraffin, which were applied for the measurement of rill erosion in the laboratory. For this study, first a clay loam soil was poured in experimental plots with 30×40 cm dimensions and slope of 20%. The study plots were then exposed to sheet erosion under simulated rainfall intensity of 50 mm h-1 with duration of 20 minutes. In the next stage, two simulated rainfall intensities of 90 and 100 mm h-1 with duration of 20 and 80 minutes, were applied, respectively. The output runoff and sediment were collected and measured. Consequently, the results of optic scanner were compared with sediment measurements and also rillmeter and paraffin methods. Average soil erosion amount at the intensity of 90 mm h-1 with duration of 20 minutes based on optic scanner, rillmeter and paraffin were 283.30±79.73, 35.8±49.27, and 45.93±9.22 gr, whereas average soil erosion amount at the intensity of 100 mm h-1 with duration of 80 minutes were 377.94±274.22, 41.5±45.71, and 46.20±11.45 gr, respectively. According to the results, it was clear that the results of optic scanner was significantly different from other methods and overestimated soil erosion.
Leila Gholami; Ataollah Kavian; Abdulvahed Khaledi Darvishan; Azame Alipour; Zahra Besarand
Abstract
Determination of time to runoff and runoff volume in watershed response management against rainfall are the key parameters in watershed system management. Among different factors of effect on time to runoff and runoff volume, the rainfall intensity is one of the most important factors. In this study, ...
Read More
Determination of time to runoff and runoff volume in watershed response management against rainfall are the key parameters in watershed system management. Among different factors of effect on time to runoff and runoff volume, the rainfall intensity is one of the most important factors. In this study, the effect of rainfall pattern on variables of time to runoff, runoff volume and coefficient was studied under simulated rainfall in the southeastern Noshahr city, Mazandaran province. To achieve the study purposes, four rainfall patterns, each with three changes in rainfall intensity (I: Low-Medium-High, II: Low-High-Low, III: High-Medium-Low, IV; High-Low-High) were simulated. Then, the time to runoff, runoff volume and runoff coefficient were measured for each rainfall pattern. The measured data were analyzed in Excel and SPSS 23 softwares to determine the relationship between the rainfall pattern and variables of time to runoff, runoff volume and runoff coefficient. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P≤0.05) in variables time to runoff, runoff volume and runoff coefficient resulted rainfall patterns. Also the results showed that, in all of rainfall patterns between mean amounts were the significant differences on time to runoff, runoff volume and runoff coefficient in level of 99 percent. The results showed that the rainfall pattern I had the longest time to runoff and rainfall pattern III had the largest amounts of runoff volume and runoff coefficient. The average time to runoff in rainfall patterns of I, II, III was 5.90, 4.24, 0.71 and 1.25 min, respectively. Also, the average runoff coefficient in rainfall patterns of I, II, III and IV measured 30.03, 49.63, 88.82 and 75.16 percent, respectively.
